Detective+Investigative+Report

media type="custom" key="4717079"

My name is Detective Roth. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a two bedroom one bathroom beach house. The alleged victim was Felix and he died in is house when his "friends" had a party at his new house. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra and her modive is that her name was staded in Felix's Will to recive money when he is dead. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. The most incriminating piece of evidence was Alfado's and Felix's Cola cups. The evidence was found next to the body. The test performed was the PH test. The results of the test we recived said that the cola was a base. This connects the suspect to the crime because Cola is noramaly a neutral (acid) so sombody must of put somthing in it. The next piece of evidence collected was white powter on Kendra's shoe. It was found out when revew on Kendra and thier was some powter on the ice cube tray. The test performed was the powter test. The results of the test showed that the powter was actualy cornstarch. This connects the suspect to the crime because the same powter was on the outside of the ice cube tray so Kendra must of touched or was near the tray. Another piece of evidence collected was cardboard. It was found next to the guitar pick. The test performed was secret note test. The results of the test were that the note on the cardboard said "Dear Martha, Im glad its over. Felix is dead. Senscerly Vera". This connects the suspect to the crime because It might say that Vera wrote it but we conected Vera's handwriting to the handwriting on the cardboard but it did not match. Then we conected it to Kendra's handwriting and it matched. 9Why would Kendra sign Vera's name?) The last piece of evidence collected was ice cubes. It was found In the ice cube tray next to the towel. The test performed was the PH test. The results of the test showed that the water in the ice was a base. This connects the suspect to the crime because the ice water is noramaly a asid (neutral) . Also, it changed to a base, just like the pop in Alfrado's and Felix's Cola cups. According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. First, Kendra took Felix's cup before he drank it and put somthing in his drink and changed his 4 ice cubes to the mystery ones. Then, she wrote a note to Martha and signed Vera's name on it. She did this so if somone were to find it, they would blame it on Vera and they would not think it was Kendra. Thats how the powter on her shoe got on the ice cube tray. then she put it back before anybody saw what really happend. finally, she when downstairs at 3:00 when Alfrado called. Therefore, Kendra committed the crime of killing Felix to recive his money.(Felix recived alot of money when his parents died of a freak bungy-jumping accadent.) **Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 81% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __**The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || __** Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  **__ || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __**The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.**__  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Conclusion clearly summarizes key information__**.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || **__Rehearsed, smooth delivery.__**  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.__**  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  __** || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  __** || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  __** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 46/57